Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 11:55

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why is Joe Biden so vocal about supporting Ukraine's defense against Russia?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Bitcoin in ‘make or break’ zone – Trump Media hints at what’s next - AMBCrypto
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ducks Select Center McQueen 10th Overall in First Round of 2025 NHL Draft - NHL.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How would you feel if your girlfriend had dick pics on her phone?
Thank you.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
AI risks 'broken' career ladder for college graduates, some experts say - ABC News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 2, Reds 0 – May 31, 2025 - Bleacher Nation